dAIvid
The coach behind StoryTeller and StoryMaster.
Have you ever read a book on craft and wished you could sit down with the author? Now you can. After I wrote STOP WRITING!, I built dAIvid — an AI version of me, trained on my methodology, my questions, and my instincts — so you can work through your story with the coach. Working with dAIvid is as close as you can get to sitting across from me.
Look at the name again. I put the AI right in the middle of it, in capital letters, because you should never have to wonder when you're working with one. A writer deserves to know who's in the room. The AI announces itself before it says a word.
This isn't an AI that's going to rewrite your ideas as soon as you look away from the computer. It's also not a sycophantic supporter parroting what you want to hear. Instead, it does what I do in a coaching session — ask hard questions, challenge your structure, expose areas to improve upon, and push you to sharpen your craft. The way a great coach pushes a great athlete.
What a session sounds like
Writer · 1:49 PM
My second act keeps sagging. I’ve rewritten it four times and it still drags.
dAIvid · 1:49 PM
Four rewrites and it still sags — that tells me the problem isn’t in the writing. It’s upstream.
A second act drags when it loses its engine. And the engine of a second act is pressure — specifically, pressure on your protagonist that keeps escalating. If any stretch of your middle feels slow, it usually means one of three things:
- Your protagonist is reacting instead of acting. Things are happening to them instead of being driven by their choices.
- The stakes aren’t compounding. Each scene should raise the cost of failure — if scenes feel interchangeable, they’re not doing that.
- A plotline went missing. Second acts need multiple threads braiding together. If one goes quiet, the whole thing flattens.
Before I can tell you which one you’re dealing with — what happens at the end of your first act? What’s the moment that kicks your protagonist into the second act world?
Writer · 1:51 PM
Well, I kind of veer into a new genre. It’s supposed to be a surprise, but I don’t think it’s landing that way.
dAIvid · 1:51 PM
That’s a diagnosis worth trusting. If you feel the surprise isn’t landing, it isn’t.
Here’s what usually kills a genre pivot: the story doesn’t plant enough seeds early. A surprise genre shift needs to feel inevitable in retrospect — the audience should hit the reveal and think “of course,” not “what?” If they’re thinking “what?” you’ve got a plant problem, not a writing problem.
The other culprit is timing. Where in the second act does the pivot happen? Because a genre shift that lands in the wrong beat feels like a story changing its mind rather than revealing itself.
What’s the genre you’re pivoting from — and what are you pivoting to?
Writer · 1:52 PM
It starts off as a buddy movie like The Hangover, and then out of nowhere, aliens land.
dAIvid · 1:52 PM
Ha — that’s a hard pivot. The Hangover meets Arrival, and the audience has no idea it’s coming.
Here’s why that’s tricky: The Hangover works because every scene is building toward the same engine — recovering a missing groom before a wedding. The comedy has a ticking clock. When aliens land, you’re not just changing the genre, you’re changing the rules of the world. That’s a bigger ask than a tonal shift.
The question is: what’s the connective tissue? Because the pivot can’t come out of nowhere — it has to feel like it was always there, hiding in plain sight. Think about From Dusk Till Dawn. It’s a crime thriller for its entire first half, then vampires show up. It works because Rodriguez plants unease in every scene — something feels off even when nothing supernatural has happened yet. The audience can’t name it, but they feel it.
So let me ask you this: in your buddy movie first half, are there any moments — even small ones — that could be reread as foreshadowing once the aliens arrive? A weird light in the sky, a news broadcast playing in the background, a throwaway joke that lands differently on a second viewing?
Because that’s your fix. Not rewriting the second act — going back into the first act and hiding the seeds.
Writer · 1:54 PM
That’s what everyone kept warning me about, and I still wanted to tell the story without setting up anything about the aliens. Ugh.
dAIvid · 1:54 PM
That “ugh” is actually a good sign — it means your instincts are working. You know something’s off, which puts you ahead of most writers who keep rewriting the wrong thing.
Here’s the thing though: you don’t have to set up the aliens. You just have to set up the feeling that the world is slightly wrong. There’s a big difference.
Setup would be: a character sees a UFO in act one. That’s on the nose and it kills the surprise.
What you actually need is: a low hum of unease underneath the comedy. Think about it — the best genre pivots don’t telegraph what’s coming. They just make you feel, in retrospect, that the universe was always a little unstable. A joke that lands weird. A news broadcast nobody pays attention to. A dog that keeps staring at the sky.
The audience doesn’t know what they’re sensing. They just sense something.
And here’s the other thing worth sitting with: The Hangover works because the comedy is built on chaos and the unknown — the guys literally don’t know what happened. That’s not far from an alien invasion story. Both are about ordinary people trying to make sense of something completely outside their control.
That connective tissue might already be there. You just haven’t leaned into it yet.
So tell me — what’s the actual story? Who are these guys, and what are they doing when the aliens show up?
A real session with dAIvid — July 2026. Scroll to read the whole exchange.
dAIvid works on the story with you — he never writes the draft. Not a line of the prose, the dialogue, or the script anyone will read. He doesn't even see Final Draft or Scrivener. This is the work before the writing: your voice, your choices. The pen stays in your hand.
Built to align with WGA rules — my read, not a certification.
The Questions You Should Be Asking
Didn't AI companies steal from writers?
Many of them took copyrighted work without paying for it, and I won't defend that. Anthropic was sued for training on pirated books and settled with authors for $1.5 billion. That was a company being held to account. But while others reach for legal gymnastics, they paid. That's why I built on them: they built their model on an actual constitution — a written code of ethical conduct — and they run the company as a public benefit corporation under an independent trust. That aligns with my values.
And on this platform, the answer goes one step further: I do not train models on your creative content. Your work stays your work — the particulars, in writing.
The full case, including how I weighed the companies against each other: Art in the Age of AI →
What does this cost the planet?
Climate impactThis application is text-based, not image or video generation. Fifty exchanges with the coach draw about 12–50 Wh of electricity and 37–150 mL of water — the electricity a 10-watt desk lamp burns in five hours, and about a second of your daily shower.
The numbers, sourced and charted: The Real Cost →
Is the method just AI in a trench coat?
I coached writers for a decade before this software existed, and the book was written before dAIvid was anything. The software is the delivery, not the source — which is why every tier works without coaching, and the book works without a screen.
The whole lineage: The Human Behind It →
Why I Put My Name on It
When a writer tells me they would never use artificial intelligence, I respect the stance. That's why I offer an AI-free version of the software — and of course, there's always the book and workbook. I share the worries. You just read three of my answers. But I have gone to great lengths to be part of the solution, not the problem — because this era is not going away, and artists will have to figure out how to coexist with it. Someone has to show the ethical way through. I would rather it be someone who loves writers. So I put my name on it.
If you were a boxer with a big fight coming, you would hire a coach. You would train before you stepped into the ring. That is what this software is — the work before the ring, the development before the draft. It isn't cheating unless coaching is cheating. I find that thrilling. I'm challenging myself in ways I didn't know I needed by harnessing this technology as a coach, and I will become a better writer in my lifetime because of it.
And I didn't stop at the name. I wrote a constitution: The Artistic Constitution, principles for how this technology serves the artist, never the other way around. dAIvid is bound by every line of it. Read it. Hold me to it.
The best way to judge a coach is a session.
Try StoryTeller free14 days, no credit card. Switch tiers any time during the trial.